J. R. Birge (University of Chicago)
|
Title:
Portfolio
Optimization with Consumption and Trading Constraints
Abstract:
Practical portfolio management often includes a variety
of constraints surrounding the consumption of resources and
liquidity in certain asset classes. In isolation, each of these
forms of constraints may have relatively little impact on
portfolio allocations, but their combined effect can be
substantial. This talk will describe various approaches to
including these constraints and will present results on their
joint effects, especially in terms of investments in alternative
asset classes.
|
J. M. Mulvey (Princeton University)
|
Title:
Optimizing a Multi-Strategy Hedge Fund
Abstract:
Hedge fund managers have much greater flexibility to
invest in novel investments and strategies than traditional
portfolio managers. Our objective is to develop a modeling
language, by which we can efficiently analyze/optimize a portfolio
of hedge fund investment strategies. The primary focus is
multi-stage stochastic programs. To illustrate the approach, we
show the advantages of a multi-strategy fund as compared with the
typical fund-of-hedge-funds.
|
R. T. Rockafellar (University of Washington)
|
Title:
Risk Measures and Safeguarding in Optimization Under Uncertainty
Abstract:
Coping with the uncertainties in future
outcomes is a
fundamental theme of optimization in a stochastic environment. It
enters in the treatment of constraints as well as the treatment of
objectives.
In the field of stochastic programming, which has grown from the
traditions of linear and quadratic programming, constraints on
future outcomes have commonly been relaxed by penalty expressions,
unless they can be satisfied almost surely through recourse actions.
Probabilistic constraints, requiring that a condition only to be
satisfied up to a given probability, have sometimes utilized
instead, but with the drawback that convexity and even continuity in
a problem formulation can be lost, except in special circumstances.
Objectives have usually taken the form of maximizing expected
utility or minimizing an expected cost which may come in part from
constraint penalties. Some extensions involving information and
entropy have also been explored.
In financial optimization, where uncertainties are likewise
unavoidable, approaches other than stochastic programming
have prevailed. Although traditional portfolio theory was focused
on minimizing variance of return subject to a constraint on expected
return, other schemes have more recently gained popularity. An
important example is constraints and objectives based on the notion
of value-at-risk, which relates closely to probabilistic constraints
and unfortunately, therefore, suffers from similar mathematical
shortcomings. Value-at-risk suffers even from financial
inconsistencies, which have led to the axiomatic development of
"coherent risk measures", including the robust alternative called
conditional value-at-risk.
|
N. Touzi (CREST, France)
|
Title:
Hedging under Gamma Constraints, Second Order BSDE's, and Fully Non-Linear PDE's
Abstract:
We provide a quasi-explicit solution to the
super-replication problem with gamma constraints. In particular, the
upper bound constraint on the gamma implies that the optimal
strategy consists in hedging a conveniently face-lifted payoff
function, while the lower bound induces an optimal stopping problem.
Motivated by this problem, we introduce the notion of second order
backward stochastic differential equations for which we prove
existence and uniqueness under some conditions. This result provides
an extension of the Feynman-Kac representation theorem to the case
of parabolic fully non-linear PDE's.
|
S. Uryasev (University of Florida)
|
Title:
Pricing Options in Incomplete Market
Abstract:
The paper considers a regression approach to pricing
options in incomplete markets. The algorithm replicates an option by
a portfolio consisting of an underlying security and a risk-free
bond. We applied the linear regression framework and quadratic
programming with linear constraints (input = sample paths of
underlying security; output = table of option prices as function of
time and price of the underlying security). Risk neutral
processes or probabilities are not needed in this framework. We
populated the model with historical prices of the underlying
security ("massaged" to the present volatility). We evaluated
numerical performance of the algorithm with several real life
datasets: options on S&P500, on natural gas futures, and on crude
oil futures.
|
S. A. Zenios (University of Cyprus)
|
Title:
Financial Products with Guarantees:
Applications, Models and Internet-Based Services
Abstract:
Endowments with a minimum
guaranteed rate of return appear
in insurance policies, pension plans and social security plans. In
several cases, especially in the insurance industry, such endowments
also participate in the business and receive bonuses from the firm's
asset portfolio. In this paper we develop a scenario based
stochastic optimization model for asset and liability management of
participating insurance policies with minimum guarantees. The model
allows the analysis of the tradeoffs facing an insurance firm in
structuring its policies as well as the choices in covering their
cost. The model is applied to the analysis of policies offered by
insurance firms in Italy and the UK. While the optimized model
results are in general agreement with current industry
practices, inefficiencies are still identified and potential
improvements are suggested.
The modeling tools developed for the management of insurance
policies are also used to develop a web-based system for individual
investors. Investors goals and risk profiles are addressed in an
integrated fashion. The requirements for real-time modeling by the
average investor must be reflected in the model, and this issue
will be discussed as well. The practical experience with this model
will be discussed.
|
|